| |
Choosing the Congress
Objectives
|
- Explain why Representative Margolies-Mezvinsky's vote in 1993 on Clinton's deficit reduction plan was a supreme act of political courage and why that vote resulted in the loss of her house seat.
- Explain why, despite the framers' original intentions, Congress was not electronically sensitive during most of the nineteenth century. Be sure to account for the rapid turnover of congressional personnel.
- Discuss the impact of reapportionment and redistricting upon congressional elections.
- Analyze why party and incumbency are the two most influential factors affecting House elections and why challengers have such difficulty in winning office.
- Define and explain such key concepts as constituency service, the frank, ombudsman, rotation services, and soft-money.
- Demonstrate why Senate elections are more perilous that House elections.
- Explain what national forces were at work in the 1994 midterm elections.
- Evaluate whether the membership of Congress should or should not mirror the great ethnic and gender diversity of the American population.
- Review the dilemmas posed by majority-minority districting after the 1996 elections.
- What were the significance for term limits in the cases of U.S. Term Limits, Inc. vs. Thornton and Bates vs. Jones?
|