Content Frame

Ethics & Philosophy of Mind

The 'problem of other minds' stems from the observation that what a person thinks and feels is private. No one else can get into your head. Neither can you get into anyone else's. So how do you know for sure what anyone else is thinking or feeling, let alone that they think or feel? You don't. By almost all ethical systems it would be considered wrong to treat people as if they didn't have a mind equivalent to your own, hence the dictum, 'how would you like it if s/he did that to you?'

Is free will an aspect of the mind? It is only when it is believed that we have free choice that we can be held morally responsible for our actions. If we "couldn't do otherwise" then praise and blame would be absurd, and therefore, there would be no such thing as ethics. The 'problem of free will,' as Ayer defines it, is that two contradictory propositions are commonly assumed, (1) that we are capable of acting freely and (2) that human behavior is entirely governed by causal laws. The conundrum is that we can't say every cause has an effect for everything in the universe except for minds and be consistent, and yet, if all human behavior is deterministically caused by our genes, then we don't really have free will.




Pearson Copyright © 1995 - 2010 Pearson Education . All rights reserved. Pearson Longman is an imprint of Pearson .
Legal Notice | Privacy Policy | Permissions

Return to the Top of this Page